- Introduction
-
FAQs on transaction reporting on supply and derivative contracts
-
II.1. TRUM
-
II.1.1 General questions
- Question 1.1.1
- Question 1.1.2
- Question 1.1.3
- Question 1.1.4
- Question 1.1.5
- Question 1.1.6
- Question 1.1.7 [DELETED]
- Question 1.1.8
- Question 1.1.9
- Question 1.1.10
- Question 1.1.11
- Question 1.1.12
- Question 1.1.13
- Question 1.1.14
- Question 1.1.15
- Question 1.1.16
- Question 1.1.17
- Question 1.1.18
- Question 1.1.19
- Question 1.1.20
- Question 1.1.21
- Question 1.1.22
- Question 1.1.23
- Question 1.1.24
- Question 1.1.25
- Question 1.1.26
- Question 1.1.27 [ARCHIVED]
- Question 1.1.28
- Question 1.1.29
- Question 1.1.30
- Question 1.1.31
- Question 1.1.32
- Question 1.1.33
- Question 1.1.34
- Question 1.1.35
- Question 1.1.36
-
II.1.1 General questions
-
II.2. Questions related to standard contracts
-
II.2.1 TRUM – Data Fields () and XSD schema Table
- Question 2.1.1 Data Field (1) and (8)
- Question 2.1.2 Data Field (2)
- Question 2.1.3 Data Field (3)
- Question 2.1.4 Data Field (3)
- Question 2.1.5 Data Field (4)
- Question 2.1.6 Data Field (4)
- Question 2.1.7 Data Field (8) [DELETED]
- Question 2.1.8 Data Field (8)
- Question 2.1.9 Data Field (8)
- Question 2.1.10 Data Field (9)
- Question 2.1.11 Data Field (11)
- Question 2.1.12 Data Field (15)
- Question 2.1.13 Data Field (15)
- Question 2.1.14 Data Field (21)
- Question 2.1.15 Data Field (21)
- Question 2.1.16 Data Field (21) [ARCHIVED]
- Question 2.1.17 Data Field (21)
- Question 2.1.18 Data field (21) and (22)
- Question 2.1.19 Data Field (23)
- Question 2.1.20 Data Field (25)
- Question 2.1.21 Data Field (25)
- Question 2.1.22 Data Field (27)
- Question 2.1.23 Data Field (27)
- Question 2.1.24 Data Field (28)
- Question 2.1.25 Data Field (28)
- Question 2.1.26 Data Field (30)
- Question 2.1.27 Data Field (30)
- Question 2.1.28 Data Field (30)
- Question 2.1.29 Data Field (30)
- Question 2.1.30 Data Field (31) [ARCHIVED]
- Question 2.1.31 Data Field (31)
- Question 2.1.32 Data Field (31)
- Question 2.1.33 Data Field (35) and (38)
- Question 2.1.34 Data Field (35), (38), (40), (41) and (42)
- Question 2.1.35 Data Field (39)
- Question 2.1.36 Data Field (40)
- Question 2.1.37 Data Field (43)
- Question 2.1.38 Data Fields (48 to 57)
- Question 2.1.39 Data Field (48)
- Question 2.1.40 Data Field (48)
- Question 2.1.41 Data Field (48)
- Question 2.1.42 Data Field (48)
- Question 2.1.43 Data Field (48)
- Question 2.1.44 Data Fields (49) and (50)
- Question 2.1.45 Data Fields (49) and (50)
- Question 2.1.46 Data Field (51) [DELETED]
- Question 2.1.47 Data Field (52)
- Question 2.1.48 Data Field (53)
- Question 2.1.49 Data Field (53)
- Question 2.1.50 Data Field (54)
- Question 2.1.51 Extra field in the schema
- Question 2.1.52 Extra field in the schema
- Question 2.1.53 Extra Field in the schema
- Question 2.1.54 Local flexibility products
- II.2.2 Trading examples – Annex II
- II.2.3 Derivatives
- II.2.4 Lifecycle events
- II.2.5 Back loading of standard contracts [ARCHIVED]
- II.2.6 Questions related to bilateral trades
- II.2.7 Questions related to ACER’s No-action Letter
-
II.2.1 TRUM – Data Fields () and XSD schema Table
-
II.3. Questions related to non-standard contracts
-
II.3.1 General questions: non-standard contracts
- Question 3.1.1
- Question 3.1.2 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.3
- Question 3.1.4
- Question 3.1.5
- Question 3.1.6
- Question 3.1.7
- Question 3.1.8
- Question 3.1.9
- Question 3.1.10
- Question 3.1.11
- Question 3.1.12
- Question 3.1.13
- Question 3.1.14
- Question 3.1.15
- Question 3.1.16
- Question 3.1.17
- Question 3.1.18
- Question 3.1.19
- Question 3.1.20
- Question 3.1.21 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.22 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.23 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.24 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.25 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.26 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.27
- Question 3.1.28
- Question 3.1.29
- Question 3.1.30
- Question 3.1.31
- Question 3.1.32
- Question 3.1.33
- Question 3.1.34
- Question 3.1.35
- Question 3.1.36
- Question 3.1.37
- Question 3.1.38
- Question 3.1.39
- Question 3.1.40
- Question 3.1.41
- Question 3.1.42
- Question 3.1.43 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.44
- Question 3.1.45
- Question 3.1.46
- Question 3.1.47
- Question 3.1.48 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.49 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.50
- Question 3.1.51
- Question 3.1.52
- Question 3.1.53
-
II.3.2 TRUM – Data Fields () and XSD schema for Table 2
- Question 3.2.1 Data Field (3)
- Question 3.2.2 Data field (11) [ARCHIVED]
- Question 3.2.3 Data field (12)
- Question 3.2.4 Data field (16) and (18)
- Question 3.2.5 Data field (19)
- Question 3.2.6 Data field (21), (22) and (23)
- Question 3.2.7 Data field (21)
- Question 3.2.8 Data field (24)
- Question 3.2.9 Data field (24) to (31)
- Question 3.2.10 Data field (24) to (30)
- Question 3.2.11 [DELETED]
- Question 3.2.12 Data field (28)
- Question 3.2.13 Data field (28) and (29)
- Question 3.2.14 Data field (30)
- Question 3.2.15 Data field (42)
- II.3.3 Trading examples – Annex II
- II.3.4 Executions under non-standard contracts
- II.3.5 Lifecycle events
- II.3.6 Back loading of non-standard contracts [ARCHIVED]
-
II.3.1 General questions: non-standard contracts
-
II.1. TRUM
-
FAQs on transaction reporting of transportation contracts
- III.4.1 Electricity
-
III.4.2 Gas
- Question 4.2.1
- Question 4.2.2
- Question 4.2.3
- Question 4.2.4
- Question 4.2.5
- Question 4.2.6
- Question 4.2.7 Reporting of capacity conversion and capacity upgrade
- Question 4.2.8
- Question 4.2.9
- Question 4.2.10
- Question 4.2.11
- Question 4.2.12
- Question 4.2.13
- Question 4.2.14
- Question 4.2.15
- Question 4.2.16 [DELETED]
- Question 4.2.17
- Question 4.2.18 [DELETED]
- Question 4.2.19
- Question 4.2.20
- Question 4.2.21
- Question 4.2.22
- Question 4.2.23
- Question 4.2.24
- Archive: FAQs on backloading
Question 1.1.17
Can you please clarify if the EMIR approach to Novations will be applied.
Scenario 1: Trade being fully novated
Will we be required to send a cancel/ exit for the trade (old UTI) against pre novation party and a ‘new’ submission for the trade (New UTI) against the new party? i.e. same UTI cannot be used post novation
Scenario 2: Trade to be split by Novation
Will we be required to send a modify (old UTI) for the trade remaining with the original party and a ‘new’ for the trade (New UTI) with new party?
Answer
In order to report a novation, an early termination with the old UTI and a new trade with a new UTI should be reported. Both market participants, MP1 and MP2 have to submit an early termination report with Action Type “C” for Cancel the old trade and e.g. MP1 and MP3 a new submission with Action Type “N” for the new trade between MP1 and MP3 with a new UTI.
Updated:
24/03/2016