Today, ACER releases its report on the Hungarian gas transmission tariffs directed at Magyar Energetikai és Közmű-szabályozási Hivatal (MEKH), the national regulatory authority (NRA) of Hungary.

The report assesses whether the proposed reference price methodology (RPM) complies with the requirements of the Network Code on Harmonised Transmission Tariff structures (NC TAR). 

What is the proposed RPM about?

The NRA proposes to:

• Apply a postage stamp RPM complemented by a 90% discount at entry points from storage and 100% discounts at exit points from storage. It also suggests applying a 50/50 entry-exit split but is open for adjustments within a 40/60 to 60/40 range subject to stakeholder feedback.
• Adopt an in-kind flow-based charge (commodity-based tariff). However, taking into consideration inputs received from stakeholders, MEKH already informed ACER about its intent to switch back to a monetary flow-based charge (already in place since 2021).
• Introduce two non-transmission services, respectively for gas odorisation and for connecting users to the network. 

What are the key findings? 

After analysing the consultation document, ACER concludes that: 

• The RPM largely complies with requirements set in Article 7 of the NC TAR. 
• ACER could not assess the compliance of the proposed flow-based charge, as the relevant NRA decision is only available in Hungarian. However, given MEKH’s intent to switch to a monetary flow-based charge, ACER referred to its 2021 analysis, assessing the compliance of the tariffs proposed at that time.
• The proposed non-transmission services also comply with EU rules. 

What does ACER recommend? 

ACER recommends that the NRA, when adopting its final decision:

• Ensure the compliance of the commodity-based tariffs with the NC TAR, particularly considering that the monetary flow-based charge will be applied instead of the in-kind one (e.g. stakeholders were consulted upon the latter, but not the former).
• Reconcile the proposed non-transmission services as required by Article 17(3) of the NC TAR.

See all ACER reports on national tariff consultation documents. 

Today, ACER releases its report on the Swedish gas transmission tariff directed at the Swedish National Regulatory Authority (NRA), Energimarknadsinspektionen (Ei), and Transmission System Operator, Swedegas.

The report assesses whether the proposed Reference Price Methodology (RPM) complies with the requirements of the Network Code on Harmonised Transmission Tariff structures (NC TAR). 

What are the key findings? 

After analysing the consultation document, ACER concludes that:

• Most of the required information is provided, however, the forecasted contracted capacity, tariff comparison between periods, and detailed information on some non-transmission services are missing. 

• The input parameters of the proposed RPM do not fulfil the transparency requirements of the NC TAR. As a result, ACER concludes that the proposed RPM is not fully compliant with the transparency principle.

• While the choice of the postage stamp methodology is well justified, limitations identified in the allowed revenue estimation and revenue reconciliation raise concerns about the cost reflectivity of the proposed tariff. Consequently, ACER cannot conclude that the proposed RPM complies with the cost-reflectivity principle. 

• The proposed RPM achieves a reasonable level of cross-subsidisation compared to the alternative capacity-weighted distance methodology while complying with the principles of non-discrimination, volume risk, and the prevention of distortions in cross-border trade. 

• The information provided on the three non-transmission services (fees for extra area consumption, capacity allocation for summer and winter periods, and capacity allocation for daily capacity products) is insufficient to assess the compliance with the NC TAR principles.

What does ACER recommend? 

ACER recommends that the NRA, when adopting its decision:

• Includes the missing elements and clarifies inconsistencies in the calculation of input parameters for the tariff-setting process, ensuring stakeholders fully understand the methodology. 

• Specifies the start of the regulatory period for the proposed RPM and the applicability of the consulted tariff.

• Provides the missing information on the three additional non-transmission services. 

ACER welcomes the steps taken by the NRA to realign the allowed revenue with Article 17 of Renewable Gas, Natural Gas and Hydrogen Regulation, ensuring it reflects the TSO’s actual costs, as long as they correspond to those of an efficient and structurally comparable network operator. 

Additionally, ACER appreciates that the TSO and NRA followed its recommendation in the 2024 tariff report and conducted another consultation on the applied methodology. 

See all ACER reports on the national tariff consultation documents.

Today, ACER releases its report on the Romanian gas transmission tariffs directed at the Autoritatea Naţională de Reglementare în domeniul Energiei (ANRE), the National Regulatory Authority (NRA) of Romania.

The report assesses whether the proposed reference price methodology (RPM) complies with the requirements of the Network Code on Harmonised Transmission Tariff structures (NC TAR). 

What are the key findings?

After analysing the NRA’s consultation document, ACER finds that, while most of the required information is available, the absence of important elements prevents a complete assessment of the proposed methodology’s compliance with the Network Code requirements. In particular:

• ANRE did not provide sufficient justification for choosing the proposed postage stamp methodology, making it difficult for stakeholders to evaluate its suitability.
• While the postage stamp methodology may be appropriate, ACER cannot determine its compliance with the NC TAR principles (e.g. cost-reflectivity, preventing cross-subsidisation, and avoiding cross-border trade distortions) without further clarification.
• While the transparency and volume risk criteria of the NC TAR are not directly addressed in the consultation document, ACER could still conclude that the proposed methodology meets these requirements. Additionally, ACER did not identify any discriminatory elements in the proposed RPM.
• Although the criteria for setting non-transmission charges are met, the non-transmission revenue is not included in the allowed revenue, contrary to Network Code requirements.
• Finally, the criteria for setting commodity charges align with NC TAR requirements.

What does ACER recommend?

ACER recommends that the NRA, when adopting its decision, further justify the choice of the proposed RPM by including the following elements:

• Further considerations on the system’s technical characteristics and flow dynamics, focusing on distance as a potential cost driver.
• The conclusions drawn from the comparison of the proposed RPM with the Capacity Weighted Distance (CWD) methodology.
• A detailed assessment of the proposed RPM against all requirements outlined in Article 7 of the NC TAR.

ACER also invites ANRE to clarify how costs associated with the inclusion of the “transit” pipeline (part of the Trans-Balkan pipeline infrastructure) in the national transmission system have been taken into account.

Access all ACER reports on national tariff consultation documents.

The EU’s Hydrogen and decarbonised gas market package (2024) aims to support the development of a competitive hydrogen market and the integration of renewable gases into Europe’s energy system. To achieve this, the package extends the role of ACER to include new hydrogen-related tasks.

One of these tasks, set out in the Regulation on hydrogen and decarbonised gas market, requires ACER to issue a recommendation on the methodologies for setting the inter-temporal cost allocation by 5 August 2025 and update it at least every two years. 

To inform the drafting of this recommendation, ACER will seek stakeholder input through a public consultation from 10 to 31 March 2025.

What is inter-temporal cost allocation?

Developing a European hydrogen market will require significant infrastructure investment to transport hydrogen from supply sites to end users. However, funding this infrastructure through traditional regulated tariffs (fees paid by network users) could result in extremely high fees for early users, making hydrogen less affordable and potentially discouraging further demand.

To address this issue, the Regulation on hydrogen and decarbonised gas market grants Member States the authority to allow hydrogen network operators to recover infrastructure costs over time through inter-temporal cost allocation mechanisms. These aim to ensure a fair distribution of costs between early and future hydrogen consumers, ensuring that the former are not disproportionately burdened.

ACER’s recommendation will provide guidance to Transmission System Operators (TSOs), Distribution System Operators (DSOs), hydrogen network operators, and National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) on how to develop and implement these mechanisms effectively.

Today, 31 January, marks the final day of the EU’s gas Market Correction Mechanism (MCM).

Established by the MCM Regulation in December 2022, in the midst of the energy crisis, this mechanism was designed to protect EU citizens and the economy against excessively high energy prices.

It tasked ACER with the calculation and publication of a daily MCM reference price. It entered into force on 1 February 2023 for an initial year and was later extended to 31 January 2025.

What is the MCM?

The MCM was a safeguard to cap gas prices in the EU. It would activate only if:

1. Gas prices at EU hubs exceeded €180/MWh for three consecutive working days.
2. These prices were at least €35/MWh higher than the MCM reference price during the same period.

Upon activation, a bidding limit would cap gas trading prices to protect the market from further escalation.

The MCM was never activated, as market conditions never met these thresholds.

The MCM’s effects on energy and financial markets have been closely monitored by ACER and by ESMA (European Securities and Markets Authority) respectively - no significant impacts on the market have been directly attributed to it. 

Read more about the MCM.

ACER has updated its data dashboard, which tracks monthly changes in household energy prices across EU Member States and Norway from January 2019 to December 2024.

The dashboard provides valuable insights for policymakers, consumer protection groups, and EU citizens by highlighting trends in end-user electricity and gas prices, supporting informed decisions on energy affordability and system costs.

What are the key findings?

Electricity prices: In 2024, household electricity prices decreased by 5% compared to 2023. This was mainly due to a 17% fall in the energy component of prices. However, this decline was partially offset by higher network costs and the phasing out of certain subsidies. In Q4, prices and their composition remained steady, showing no significant changes compared to the previous quarter.

Gas prices: Similarly, household gas prices fell by an average of 7% in 2024, driven by the 20% drop in the energy component. Removal of subsidies contributed to a rise in the tax component, partially offsetting the decrease. In the last quarter, the average end-user gas prices slightly increased.

What lies ahead?

The drop in energy costs reflects the impact of Europe's growing use of renewable energy. However, as renewable energy generation expands, there will be a need for substantial investment in energy infrastructure, which could lead to higher network costs in the future.

The European Commission’s upcoming Action Plan on Energy Affordability will be key in addressing these challenges. The current trends highlight the importance of looking at the overall costs of the energy system (including network and infrastructure expenses), rather than focusing solely on commodity costs.

ACER will continue updating the dashboard quarterly to monitor the developments in energy affordability for European consumers.

Today, ACER issues its Recommendation proposing potential improvements to the gas Capacity Allocation Mechanisms Network Code (CAM NC).

The CAM NC harmonises how Transmission System Operators (TSOs) offer and allocate available gas transmission pipeline capacity to network users. The network code, last amended in 2017, needs to be updated to reflect Europe’s decarbonisation goals and the evolving gas market.

The revision process

In 2023, ACER initiated the revision process, as invited by the European Commission. The revision process was informed by new regulatory elements from the hydrogen and gas decarbonisation package, ACER’s initial analysis of the network code's achievements and areas for improvement, and dialogue with stakeholders.

Following the analysis of inputs received during the last consultation (September-October 2024), ACER concluded the revision process by issuing its Recommendation to the European Commission on 20 December 2024.

What are the main recommendations?

• Utilise the current gas system efficiently and strengthen its monitoring by improving transparency on how capacity is maximised, and enhance coordination and consultation among relevant regulatory authorities, TSOs and network users.  
• Enhance transmission capacity that is made available by increasing auction opportunities for existing capacity products and introducing a capacity offer between monthly and daily auctions, thereby contributing to security of supply.
• Allow a quick modification of non-essential auction details to ensure auctions can reflect the evolving market conditions, while maintaining harmonised rules for capacity allocation across all interconnection points.

What are the next steps?

The European Commission can amend the network code following the comitology process. ACER’s Recommendation offers a starting point for that process.

Today, ACER issues its Opinion on the draft statutory documents proposed by future hydrogen transmission network operators to formally establish the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH) as an association under the Belgian law.

As an independent body, ENNOH will be responsible for fostering collaboration among hydrogen transmission network operators across the EU.

What’s the role of ACER?

ACER is mandated to provide an Opinion on ENNOH’s draft statutory documents, which were submitted at the end of August.

ACER conducted a public consultation from 23 September to 21 October 2024, seeking views from organisations representing all stakeholders, in particular hydrogen system users, including customers. All responses received are available on the consultation page.

What is the main conclusion?

ACER welcomes the draft statutory documents received, and suggests how to enhance them to further support the establishment of ENNOH. ACER highlights, however, that a crucial factor for success lies in the timely and committed transposition of certification provisions from the Hydrogen and Decarbonised Gas Market Directive by the Member States. This responsibility, ACER notes, rests with the relevant ministries, not ENNOH or its members.

What are the next steps?

This ACER’s Opinion is addressed to the European Commission, which now has three months to provide its opinion. Should the Commission’s opinion be favourable, future hydrogen transmission network operators will have three months to adopt and publish the statutory documents.

ACER issues its Opinion on the Winter Supply Outlook 2024/25 published by the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSOG).

ENTSOG’s Winter Supply Outlook 2024/2025 evaluates the resilience of the European gas system by analysing different scenarios involving prolonged disruptions of Russian gas imports. The Outlook focuses also on Europe’s preparedness for winter 2024/2025 and summer 2025, examining its gas system’s capacity to cope with typical and severe winter conditions (including high demand and the consequences of the expiry of Ukraine’s gas transit agreement with Russia by the end of December 2024). It also assesses the potential impact of supply disruption via the TurkStream pipeline (running from Russia to Turkey) and models varying levels of Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) supply to Europe, including high, standard, and low supply scenarios.

Highlights of ENTSOG’s Winter Supply Outlook:

• High gas storage levels: on 1 October 2024, EU gas storage reached 94% of its capacity, thanks to reduced consumption, high initial storage levels, and measures by Member States.

• Monitor withdrawals from gas storage: Early gas withdrawals could deplete storage by the end of the season, increasing the risk of demand curtailment during cold spells.

• Summer storage targets: maintaining 30-40% of storage at the start of the next injection season (March 2025) is crucial to meet the 90% target by the end of summer 2025.

• Reduced reliance on Russian gas: the EU could maintain 40% storage levels at this winter's end without Russian pipeline gas, showing increased independence.

• Mitigating full supply disruptions: in case of a full gas supply disruption, extra supplies mainly from LNG imports and a 15% demand reduction are needed to avoid curtailment and maintain storage levels.

• LNG and Norwegian gas: LNG and Norwegian gas are now primary sources for EU Member States and the Energy Community’s contracting parties.

What is in ACER’s Opinion?

• ACER acknowledges that ENTSOG enlarged the scope of its methodology to include gas supply and storage developments (i.e. strategic reserves based on each Member States’ regulations, Ukrainian storage as a last resort) and to reconsider the role of LNG regasification terminal tanks for short-term storage flexibility. ACER also supports ENTSOG's efforts to model a ‘low LNG supply scenario’ that excludes Russian LNG supplies.

• ACER acknowledges that ENTSOG enlarged the scope of its methodology to include gas supply and storage developments (i.e. strategic reserves based on each Member States’ regulations, Ukrainian storage as a last resort) and to reconsider the role of LNG regasification terminal tanks for short-term storage flexibility. ACER also supports ENTSOG's efforts to model a ‘low LNG supply scenario’ that excludes Russian LNG supplies.

• ACER recommends ENTSOG to consider the following methodological improvements:
  • The inclusion of a qualitative analysis of gas futures prices and summer-winter spreads for better forecasting of potential challenges for market-based filling of gas storages.
  • Clarify the assumptions and methodology used to build the ‘low LNG supply scenario’.
  • Specify capacities added by newly commissioned projects.
  • Compare seasonal demand projections with forecasts from other institutions.

• ACER highlights the importance of a close cooperation between ENTSOG and ENTSO-E to ensure consistent results in their respective seasonal outlooks. In addition, ACER identified several risk factors for the upcoming year:
  • likely stop of Russian gas transit through Ukraine after 2024;
  • unusually cold winter;
  • failure to reduce gas demand;
  • increased demand volatility from gas power plants;
  • rising Asian gas demand;
  • low storage levels at the end of winter;
  • operational incidents in supply routes;
  • rising tensions in the Middle East affecting LNG flows and crude prices.

ACER has released its Opinion on the recent coordinated decisions to grant a temporary exemption for the STORK I pipeline from the requirement to establish permanent physical bi-directional gas flow capacity at the cross-border interconnection point (IP) ‘Cieszyn/Český Těšín’ between Poland and the Czech Republic.

What is bi-directional gas flow capacity?

Under the European Security of Gas Supply Regulation, Transmission System Operators (TSOs) must establish permanent physical capacity for gas transport in both directions (bi-directional capacity) at all IPs between Member States. However, temporary exemptions can be granted following a detailed assessment and consultations with stakeholders, other Member States, and the European Commission.

ACER’s assessment

ACER reviewed the coordinated decisions taken by the Czech and Polish responsible Ministries. Both decisions accept the respective TSOs’ proposals to grant the temporary exemption until the end of 2025.

ACER notes that:

• The exemption complies with regulatory requirements.
• The reverse gas flow project at this IP is unlikely to significantly enhance gas supply security (e.g. the N-1 indicator) in the Czech Republic. However, enabling reverse flow could offer some benefits for the Czech Republic, such as improved access to Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) supplies from Poland.
• A market assessment by the project promoters shows no interest in developing transportation capacity from Poland to the Czech Republic.
• The exemption (valid until December 2025) allows more time to evaluate the project's necessity and feasibility.

Before the exemption expires, ACER recommends that project promoters reassess the project, focusing on:

• technical solutions on the Czech side to enable firm capacities and ensure permanent physical reverse flow capabilities;
• market interest and expected gas flows; and
• the project’s potential to reduce the Czech Republic’s dependency on Russian gas.

What are the next steps?

ACER has submitted its Opinion to the relevant authorities of the Czech Republic and Poland, as well as to the European Commission for further consideration. The Commission may choose to either raise no objections to the decisions or request modifications.