- Introduction
- FAQs on transaction reporting on supply and derivative contracts
- II.1. TRUM
- II.1.1 General questions
- Question 1.1.1
- Question 1.1.2
- Question 1.1.3
- Question 1.1.4
- Question 1.1.5
- Question 1.1.6
- Question 1.1.7 [DELETED]
- Question 1.1.8
- Question 1.1.9
- Question 1.1.10
- Question 1.1.11
- Question 1.1.12
- Question 1.1.13
- Question 1.1.14
- Question 1.1.15
- Question 1.1.16
- Question 1.1.17
- Question 1.1.18
- Question 1.1.19
- Question 1.1.20
- Question 1.1.21
- Question 1.1.22
- Question 1.1.23
- Question 1.1.24
- Question 1.1.25
- Question 1.1.26
- Question 1.1.27 [ARCHIVED]
- Question 1.1.28
- Question 1.1.29
- Question 1.1.30
- Question 1.1.31
- Question 1.1.32
- Question 1.1.33
- Question 1.1.34
- Question 1.1.35
- Question 1.1.36
- II.1.1 General questions
- II.2. Questions related to standard contracts
- II.2.1 TRUM – Data Fields () and XSD schema Table
- Question 2.1.1 Data Field (1) and (8)
- Question 2.1.2 Data Field (2)
- Question 2.1.3 Data Field (3)
- Question 2.1.4 Data Field (3)
- Question 2.1.5 Data Field (4)
- Question 2.1.6 Data Field (4)
- Question 2.1.7 Data Field (8) [DELETED]
- Question 2.1.8 Data Field (8)
- Question 2.1.9 Data Field (8)
- Question 2.1.10 Data Field (9)
- Question 2.1.11 Data Field (11)
- Question 2.1.12 Data Field (15)
- Question 2.1.13 Data Field (15)
- Question 2.1.14 Data Field (21)
- Question 2.1.15 Data Field (21)
- Question 2.1.16 Data Field (21) [ARCHIVED]
- Question 2.1.17 Data Field (21)
- Question 2.1.18 Data field (21) and (22)
- Question 2.1.19 Data Field (23)
- Question 2.1.20 Data Field (25)
- Question 2.1.21 Data Field (25)
- Question 2.1.22 Data Field (27)
- Question 2.1.23 Data Field (27)
- Question 2.1.24 Data Field (28)
- Question 2.1.25 Data Field (28)
- Question 2.1.26 Data Field (30)
- Question 2.1.27 Data Field (30)
- Question 2.1.28 Data Field (30)
- Question 2.1.29 Data Field (30)
- Question 2.1.30 Data Field (31) [ARCHIVED]
- Question 2.1.31 Data Field (31)
- Question 2.1.32 Data Field (31)
- Question 2.1.33 Data Field (35) and (38)
- Question 2.1.34 Data Field (35), (38), (40), (41) and (42)
- Question 2.1.35 Data Field (39)
- Question 2.1.36 Data Field (40)
- Question 2.1.37 Data Field (43)
- Question 2.1.38 Data Fields (48 to 57)
- Question 2.1.39 Data Field (48)
- Question 2.1.40 Data Field (48)
- Question 2.1.41 Data Field (48)
- Question 2.1.42 Data Field (48)
- Question 2.1.43 Data Field (48)
- Question 2.1.44 Data Fields (49) and (50)
- Question 2.1.45 Data Fields (49) and (50)
- Question 2.1.46 Data Field (51) [DELETED]
- Question 2.1.47 Data Field (52)
- Question 2.1.48 Data Field (53)
- Question 2.1.49 Data Field (53)
- Question 2.1.50 Data Field (54)
- Question 2.1.51 Extra field in the schema
- Question 2.1.52 Extra field in the schema
- Question 2.1.53 Extra Field in the schema
- Question 2.1.54 Local flexibility products
- II.2.2 Trading examples – Annex II
- II.2.3 Derivatives
- II.2.4 Lifecycle events
- II.2.5 Back loading of standard contracts [ARCHIVED]
- II.2.6 Questions related to bilateral trades
- II.2.7 Questions related to ACER’s No-action Letter
- II.2.1 TRUM – Data Fields () and XSD schema Table
- II.3. Questions related to non-standard contracts
- II.3.1 General questions: non-standard contracts
- Question 3.1.1
- Question 3.1.2 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.3
- Question 3.1.4
- Question 3.1.5
- Question 3.1.6
- Question 3.1.7
- Question 3.1.8
- Question 3.1.9
- Question 3.1.10
- Question 3.1.11
- Question 3.1.12
- Question 3.1.13
- Question 3.1.14
- Question 3.1.15
- Question 3.1.16
- Question 3.1.17
- Question 3.1.18
- Question 3.1.19
- Question 3.1.20
- Question 3.1.21 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.22 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.23 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.24 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.25 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.26 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.27
- Question 3.1.28
- Question 3.1.29
- Question 3.1.30
- Question 3.1.31
- Question 3.1.32
- Question 3.1.33
- Question 3.1.34
- Question 3.1.35
- Question 3.1.36
- Question 3.1.37
- Question 3.1.38
- Question 3.1.39
- Question 3.1.40
- Question 3.1.41
- Question 3.1.42
- Question 3.1.43 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.44
- Question 3.1.45
- Question 3.1.46
- Question 3.1.47
- Question 3.1.48 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.49 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.50
- Question 3.1.51
- Question 3.1.52
- Question 3.1.53
- II.3.2 TRUM – Data Fields () and XSD schema for Table 2
- Question 3.2.1 Data Field (3)
- Question 3.2.2 Data field (11) [ARCHIVED]
- Question 3.2.3 Data field (12)
- Question 3.2.4 Data field (16) and (18)
- Question 3.2.5 Data field (19)
- Question 3.2.6 Data field (21), (22) and (23)
- Question 3.2.7 Data field (21)
- Question 3.2.8 Data field (24)
- Question 3.2.9 Data field (24) to (31)
- Question 3.2.10 Data field (24) to (30)
- Question 3.2.11 [DELETED]
- Question 3.2.12 Data field (28)
- Question 3.2.13 Data field (28) and (29)
- Question 3.2.14 Data field (30)
- Question 3.2.15 Data field (42)
- II.3.3 Trading examples – Annex II
- II.3.4 Executions under non-standard contracts
- II.3.5 Lifecycle events
- II.3.6 Back loading of non-standard contracts [ARCHIVED]
- II.3.1 General questions: non-standard contracts
- II.1. TRUM
- FAQs on transaction reporting of transportation contracts
- III.4.1 Electricity
- III.4.2 Gas
- Question 4.2.1
- Question 4.2.2
- Question 4.2.3
- Question 4.2.4
- Question 4.2.5
- Question 4.2.6
- Question 4.2.7 Reporting of capacity conversion and capacity upgrade
- Question 4.2.8
- Question 4.2.9
- Question 4.2.10
- Question 4.2.11
- Question 4.2.12
- Question 4.2.13
- Question 4.2.14
- Question 4.2.15
- Question 4.2.16 [DELETED]
- Question 4.2.17
- Question 4.2.18 [DELETED]
- Question 4.2.19
- Question 4.2.20
- Question 4.2.21
- Question 4.2.22
- Question 4.2.23
- Question 4.2.24
- Archive: FAQs on backloading
Question 2.1.27 Data Field (30)
The question is related to the timings in the reporting: in the TRUM it is indicated that timings have to be expressed in UTC format (ISO 8601 date and time format using UTC time format). However in the trading examples we see two ways of representing timings:
2014-01-29T10:35:56.000Z or 2014-01-29T12:35:56.000+02 :00
It seems more pertinent to use the “+02:00” expression as indicated in the attached trading example.
Could you please confirm that one can report in local timings followed by “+02:00”?
Answer
According to ACER’s schemas and the ISO 8601 standard date and time in UTC can be either reported as
2014-01-29T10:35:56.000Z or 2014-01-29T12:35:56.000+02 :00
Updated:
08/09/2015