- Introduction
-
FAQs on transaction reporting on supply and derivative contracts
-
II.1. TRUM
-
II.1.1 General questions
- Question 1.1.1
- Question 1.1.2
- Question 1.1.3
- Question 1.1.4
- Question 1.1.5
- Question 1.1.6
- Question 1.1.7 [DELETED]
- Question 1.1.8
- Question 1.1.9
- Question 1.1.10
- Question 1.1.11
- Question 1.1.12
- Question 1.1.13
- Question 1.1.14
- Question 1.1.15
- Question 1.1.16
- Question 1.1.17
- Question 1.1.18
- Question 1.1.19
- Question 1.1.20
- Question 1.1.21
- Question 1.1.22
- Question 1.1.23
- Question 1.1.24
- Question 1.1.25
- Question 1.1.26
- Question 1.1.27 [ARCHIVED]
- Question 1.1.28
- Question 1.1.29
- Question 1.1.30
- Question 1.1.31
- Question 1.1.32
- Question 1.1.33
- Question 1.1.34
- Question 1.1.35
- Question 1.1.36
-
II.1.1 General questions
-
II.2. Questions related to standard contracts
-
II.2.1 TRUM – Data Fields () and XSD schema Table
- Question 2.1.1 Data Field (1) and (8)
- Question 2.1.2 Data Field (2)
- Question 2.1.3 Data Field (3)
- Question 2.1.4 Data Field (3)
- Question 2.1.5 Data Field (4)
- Question 2.1.6 Data Field (4)
- Question 2.1.7 Data Field (8) [DELETED]
- Question 2.1.8 Data Field (8)
- Question 2.1.9 Data Field (8)
- Question 2.1.10 Data Field (9)
- Question 2.1.11 Data Field (11)
- Question 2.1.12 Data Field (15)
- Question 2.1.13 Data Field (15)
- Question 2.1.14 Data Field (21)
- Question 2.1.15 Data Field (21)
- Question 2.1.16 Data Field (21) [ARCHIVED]
- Question 2.1.17 Data Field (21)
- Question 2.1.18 Data field (21) and (22)
- Question 2.1.19 Data Field (23)
- Question 2.1.20 Data Field (25)
- Question 2.1.21 Data Field (25)
- Question 2.1.22 Data Field (27)
- Question 2.1.23 Data Field (27)
- Question 2.1.24 Data Field (28)
- Question 2.1.25 Data Field (28)
- Question 2.1.26 Data Field (30)
- Question 2.1.27 Data Field (30)
- Question 2.1.28 Data Field (30)
- Question 2.1.29 Data Field (30)
- Question 2.1.30 Data Field (31) [ARCHIVED]
- Question 2.1.31 Data Field (31)
- Question 2.1.32 Data Field (31)
- Question 2.1.33 Data Field (35) and (38)
- Question 2.1.34 Data Field (35), (38), (40), (41) and (42)
- Question 2.1.35 Data Field (39)
- Question 2.1.36 Data Field (40)
- Question 2.1.37 Data Field (43)
- Question 2.1.38 Data Fields (48 to 57)
- Question 2.1.39 Data Field (48)
- Question 2.1.40 Data Field (48)
- Question 2.1.41 Data Field (48)
- Question 2.1.42 Data Field (48)
- Question 2.1.43 Data Field (48)
- Question 2.1.44 Data Fields (49) and (50)
- Question 2.1.45 Data Fields (49) and (50)
- Question 2.1.46 Data Field (51) [DELETED]
- Question 2.1.47 Data Field (52)
- Question 2.1.48 Data Field (53)
- Question 2.1.49 Data Field (53)
- Question 2.1.50 Data Field (54)
- Question 2.1.51 Extra field in the schema
- Question 2.1.52 Extra field in the schema
- Question 2.1.53 Extra Field in the schema
- Question 2.1.54 Local flexibility products
- II.2.2 Trading examples – Annex II
- II.2.3 Derivatives
- II.2.4 Lifecycle events
- II.2.5 Back loading of standard contracts [ARCHIVED]
- II.2.6 Questions related to bilateral trades
- II.2.7 Questions related to ACER’s No-action Letter
-
II.2.1 TRUM – Data Fields () and XSD schema Table
-
II.3. Questions related to non-standard contracts
-
II.3.1 General questions: non-standard contracts
- Question 3.1.1
- Question 3.1.2 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.3
- Question 3.1.4
- Question 3.1.5
- Question 3.1.6
- Question 3.1.7
- Question 3.1.8
- Question 3.1.9
- Question 3.1.10
- Question 3.1.11
- Question 3.1.12
- Question 3.1.13
- Question 3.1.14
- Question 3.1.15
- Question 3.1.16
- Question 3.1.17
- Question 3.1.18
- Question 3.1.19
- Question 3.1.20
- Question 3.1.21 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.22 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.23 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.24 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.25 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.26 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.27
- Question 3.1.28
- Question 3.1.29
- Question 3.1.30
- Question 3.1.31
- Question 3.1.32
- Question 3.1.33
- Question 3.1.34
- Question 3.1.35
- Question 3.1.36
- Question 3.1.37
- Question 3.1.38
- Question 3.1.39
- Question 3.1.40
- Question 3.1.41
- Question 3.1.42
- Question 3.1.43 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.44
- Question 3.1.45
- Question 3.1.46
- Question 3.1.47
- Question 3.1.48 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.49 [DELETED]
- Question 3.1.50
- Question 3.1.51
- Question 3.1.52
- Question 3.1.53
-
II.3.2 TRUM – Data Fields () and XSD schema for Table 2
- Question 3.2.1 Data Field (3)
- Question 3.2.2 Data field (11) [ARCHIVED]
- Question 3.2.3 Data field (12)
- Question 3.2.4 Data field (16) and (18)
- Question 3.2.5 Data field (19)
- Question 3.2.6 Data field (21), (22) and (23)
- Question 3.2.7 Data field (21)
- Question 3.2.8 Data field (24)
- Question 3.2.9 Data field (24) to (31)
- Question 3.2.10 Data field (24) to (30)
- Question 3.2.11 [DELETED]
- Question 3.2.12 Data field (28)
- Question 3.2.13 Data field (28) and (29)
- Question 3.2.14 Data field (30)
- Question 3.2.15 Data field (42)
- II.3.3 Trading examples – Annex II
- II.3.4 Executions under non-standard contracts
- II.3.5 Lifecycle events
- II.3.6 Back loading of non-standard contracts [ARCHIVED]
-
II.3.1 General questions: non-standard contracts
-
II.1. TRUM
-
FAQs on transaction reporting of transportation contracts
- III.4.1 Electricity
-
III.4.2 Gas
- Question 4.2.1
- Question 4.2.2
- Question 4.2.3
- Question 4.2.4
- Question 4.2.5
- Question 4.2.6
- Question 4.2.7 Reporting of capacity conversion and capacity upgrade
- Question 4.2.8
- Question 4.2.9
- Question 4.2.10
- Question 4.2.11
- Question 4.2.12
- Question 4.2.13
- Question 4.2.14
- Question 4.2.15
- Question 4.2.16 [DELETED]
- Question 4.2.17
- Question 4.2.18 [DELETED]
- Question 4.2.19
- Question 4.2.20
- Question 4.2.21
- Question 4.2.22
- Question 4.2.23
- Question 4.2.24
- Archive: FAQs on backloading
Question 3.1.6
How should we report non-standard contracts and executions under the framework of non-standard contracts with two delivery zones?
Answer
A non-standard contract that includes more than one delivery zone is reported with Table 2 by repeating the corresponding Field (48) delivery point or zone as many times as the delivery zones included in the contract identifying each EIC Y code.
When executions under the framework of a non-standard contract have a price which is set with different price formula depending on the delivery point of the commodity, then these executions should be reported separately (one report for each delivery point).
When executions under the framework of a non-standard contract have a price which is set with one price formula for all the delivery points of the commodity, and the volume split is known to the market participant, then these executions should be reported separately (one report for each delivery point).
When executions under the framework of a non-standard contract have a price which is set with one price formula for all the delivery points of the commodity, and the volume split is NOT known to the market participant, then these executions can be reported with one report (e.g. one report indicating the total volume and indicating, for example, two delivery points).
Updated:
16/02/2016