ACER is committed to sharing knowledge and first-hand experience with relevant stakeholders and interested parties. 

​ACER communicates the relevant information via dedicated REMIT publications: ​

​First published in March 2015, the REMIT Quarterly is ACER's main channel of communication with stakeholders on REMIT-related matters. It primarily provides updates on ACER's activities, as well as guidance on the application of the REMIT framework and data reporting.

The REMIT Quarterly also reports any assessments of the operation and transparency of different categories of organised market places and ways of trading, in accordance with Article 7(3) of REMIT.

The REMIT Quarterly is published each quarter on ACER's REMIT Portal. ​

​In accordance with Article 7(3) of REMIT, ACER shall assess on an annual basis the operation and transparency of different categories of organised market places (OMPs) and ways of trading.

The REMIT Annual Report was discontinued in 2017. Ever since, ACER reports its transparency assessments through the REMIT Quarterly instead.​

Access ACE​R Q​​&As and explore the different sections:

• Background information on REMIT
• ACER's role
• REMIT Definitions
• Obligations and prohibitions for market participants
• Timeline of the implementation​

An Inside Information Platform (IIP) is an electronic system for the delivery of information which allows multiple market participants to share information with the wider public and complies with the minimum quality requirements listed in the ACER Guidance.

The Regulation on guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure (TEN-E Regulation) introduced the cross-border cost allocation (CBCA) as a regulatory tool to facilitate the implementation of projects of common interest (PCIs).

European PCIs and Projects of Mutual Interests (PMIs) are key cross-border infrastructure projects that further link the energy systems of EU countries. Such infrastructure projects are a strategic priority for achieving Europe’s ambitious clean energy goals.

CBCA decisions establish the sharing of the efficient investment costs of a PCI between the countries which are significantly impacted by the projects. NRAs jointly scrutinise the investment requests and determine which countries will contribute to financing them, and in which proportion. Cost sharing agreements may facilitate the implementation of PCIs if the territorial distribution of benefits and costs is not well aligned.

Promoters of PCIs and PMIs can submit their investment requests, including for CBCA, to the relevant national regulatory authority (NRA).​ In case the NRAs cannot reach an agreement after 6 months, or upon NRAs’ joint request, ACER serves as a last-resort decision maker in CBCA cases.

CBCA Guidelines

In June 2023, ACER adopted a recommendation for identifying good practices for the treatment of investment requests for PCIs. It builds upon past decisions and stakeholders’ feedback collected through a workshop and public consultation.

The recommendation provides guidance to project promoters on submitting investment requests, as well as to NRAs on their assessment and the allocation of costs among Member States. Additionally, it outlines reporting requirements of project promoters towards NRAs and transmission system operators (TSOs) of the relevant Member States.

What are the main elements of ACER’s CBCA recommendation?

• Pragmatism and flexibility, as there is no one-fits-all solution;
• Basic guiding principles for all projects;
• CBCA also for clusters of projects;
• Choice and evaluation of scenarios;
• A stable framework for the identification of contributing countries;
• Treatment of uncertainty and adjustment mechanisms.

This CBCA recommendation shall be regularly updated as necessary, in particular to ensure consistency with the principles on the offshore grids for renewable energy cross-border cost sharing. ACER shall consult all relevant stakeholders when modifying the recommendation.

CBCA monitoring

ACER’s 2025 monitoring shows:

• 65% fewer CBCA decisions issued in the second half of the monitoring period (2019-2024), reflecting a drop in eligible cross-border projects due to completed infrastructure, the phase-out of natural gas and Brexit.
• Costs stay national in most cases, as Member States usually agree to cover their own share.
• Access to EU grants via the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) is the main reason project promoters submit investment requests. 
• No CBCA decisions yet for hydrogen, as the sector is still in early stage of development.

​For NRAs:

NRAs should inform ACER about investment requests and CBCA decisions without delay and share the relevant documents.

For promoters:

​The guidance on the submission of an investment request for project promoters is accompanied by a template (Annex IV) summarising all relevant information to be provided.​

The Regulation on guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure (TEN-E Regulation) was first introduced in 2013 to facilitate the development of European energy networks.

The Regulation was revised in 2022 to align with the goals of the European Green Deal and introduced the concept of projects of mutual interest (PMIs) alongside the existing projects of common interest (PCIs). These are key cross-border infrastructure projects designed to improve network connections between EU Member States (PCIs) or with non-EU countries (PMIs). These projects benefit from accelerated permitting procedures and funding, as they are key to achieving the EU’s energy and climate objectives.

The European Commission is responsible for selecting and publishing a list of these projects every two years (known as the Union list). In 2024, the Commission published the first Union list including both PCIs and PMIs.

ACER monitors and evaluates the implementation progress of PCIs and PMIs based on reports submitted by project promoters and national competent authorities.

In May 2025, ACER published its first interactive dashboard presenting the monitoring findings for both PCIs and PMIs.

Pursuant to Article 59(1) of EB Regulation, ENTSO-E shall publish a European report focusing on monitoring, describing and analysing the implementation of EB Regulation, as well as reporting on the progress made concerning the integration of balancing markets in Europe.

The format of the report shall vary as follow:

(a) two years after entry into force of this Regulation and subsequently every second year a detailed report shall be published;

(b) three years after entry into force of this Regulation and subsequently every second year a shorter version of the report shall be published to review the progress made and update the performance indicators.

No actions have been completed yet with regard to this topic.​

Pursuant to Article 60 of EB Regulation, at least once every two years, each TSO shall publish a report on balancing covering the previous two calendar years, which shall either be in English or at least contain an executive summary in English. The Agency plans to gather and publish these reports.

No actions have been completed yet with regard to this topic.​

The North West (NW) region has been inactive since 2014. Cooperation continues on a bilateral or multilateral basis, outside the setting of the GRI.

​
The region was formed by the following countries:

• Belgium

• Denmark

• France

• Germany

• Ireland

• Luxemburg

• Netherlands

• Sweden

• United Kingdom

• Norway (observer, non-EU country)

The region produces, and consumes, the highest amount of gas in Europe. The region also hosts the most developed gas markets and hubs in the EU.

The South South-East (SSE) region includes 20 countries: 12 EU Member States, plus 8 Energy Community Contracting Parties.

The South South-East Gas Regional Initiative is composed of:

• Austria

• Bulgaria

• Croatia

• Cyprus

• Czech Republic

• Greece

• Hungary

• Italy

• Poland

• Romania

• Slovakia

• Slovenia

Participating Energy Community Contracting Parties:

• Albania

• Bosnia and Herzegovina

• Kosovo

• Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

• Moldova

• Montenegro

• Serbia

• Ukraine

The region is co-chaired by ERC and E-Control (respectively the North Macedonian and Austrian energy regulator).

The participation of the Energy Community in the GRI SSE is the result of an intensified cooperation started in 2014. Since then, the Energy Community Secretariat has joined the meetings together with the Contracting Parties.​​

The South Gas Regional Initiative is composed of:

• Spain

• Portugal

• France

The Spanish Commission for Markets and Competition (CNMC) leads the Initiative, whose long-term goal is to integrate France, Portugal and Spain into a single regional gas market. ​

Moving forward the further integration of the Spanish and Portuguese markets, Transmission System Operators have proposed a new algorithm to offer cross-border day-ahead interruptible capacity as bundled product.

​​​​The Baltic Regional Gas Market Coordination Group is composed of:

• Finland

• Estonia

• Latvia

• Lithuania​

​The first Regional Gas Market Coordination Group (RGMCG) Action Plan began on 2017 with the implementation of the implicit capacity allocation of the interconnection points between Latvia-Lithuania and Estonia-Latvia. It provided the organised market place where gas could be easily traded cross-border, while at the same time minimising the administrative burden of potentially having third party access (TPA) and balancing agreements between Transmission System Operators (TSOs).

In 2018, the tariff model and inter-TSO compensation (ITC) mechanism for the common Baltic-Finnish market was created, resulting in a stepwise integration approach.

The NRAs of Finland, Estonia and Latvia (FinEstLat) agreed to strengthen their cooperation by creating the FinEstLat market, which became operational on 1 January 2020.

The FinEstLat single natural gas transmission entry-exit system, also called the 'FinEstLat system', has specific characteristics.

The NRAs have amended the methodologies for calculating the transmission tariffs and approved the tariff scheme, which became applicable as of 1 January 2020. ACER published its analyses of the consultation documents of the Estonian, Latvian, Lithuanian and Finnish ​reference price methodologies.

Two balancing areas are set up in the FinEstLat system, considering the different level of market maturity in the FinEstLat countries: the common Estonian-Latvian balancing zone and the Finnish balancing zone.

The Regional Gas Market Coordination Group (RGMCG) continues working on a four-country market model, including Lithuania into the regional market.​​​​

Following the Roadmap approved in early 2020:

• In March 2020: the Common Regulations for the Use of Natural Gas Transmission System were amended eliminating the inconsistencies that arose during the first months of operating Estonia-Latvia common balancing zone.

• In April-August 2020: external analysis was carried out by Artelys to support a four-country entry tariff area and to design and justify an ITC-model for the four countries that is compliant with all the requirements.

• In May-August 2020: the TSOs jointly conducted an analysis for further integration options and concluded that full market integration should be decided upon only after operational efficiency is significantly improved (internal congestion eliminated), i.e. after 2024 when PCI “Enhancement of Latvia-Lithuania interconnection” is completed.

• ​In August 2020: the region started to develop the Solidarity agreement based on the Regulation safeguarding the security of gas supply.

• ​In October 2020: a Memorandum of understanding was signed between the four NRAs to facilitate cooperation, coordination and the creation of the Baltic-Finnish market. A Working Group with the four NRAs was also established.

• ​In December 2020: the regional TSOs scrutinized the benefits of a common system for issuing and trading guarantees of origin for gre​en gases.